two PhD projects at the University of Edinburgh.Advisory team: Dr. Laura Ross (Edinburgh), Dr. Konrad Lohse (Edinburgh), Dr. Andy Gardner (st Andrews) and Dr. Lyn Cook (University of Queensland) Project 1: Intralocus sexual conflict and genome evolution in haplodiploid organisms Sexual conflicts result from a clash of interests between the sexes [1]. In many cases, this battle is fought at the level of the gene: males and females may differ with respect to which version of a gene maximizes their Darwinian fitness. Whilst the effects of such intralocus sexual conflicts have been studied intensively in many organisms, the vast majority of studies have focused on species with classical, diploid sexual reproduction. However, as many as 15% of animal species exhibit an alternative, haplodiploid mode of inheritance. In such species, mothers monopolize the production of male offspring, either by asexual production of sons or by producing sons that eliminate their father's genome after the zygote stage [2]. This asymmetrical mode of inheritance is likely to affect the outcome of intralocus sexual conflict. Specifically, as alleles that favour male fitness cannot be passed on directly from fathers to sons, sexual conflicts may be resolved in favour of females [2]. The aim of this project is to study the fate of alleles under intralocus sexual conflict in a range of haplodiploid taxa. Studying such exceptions to the general rules of reproduction provides illumination of the fundamental principles of evolutionary genetics (see [3] for a recent comparable example). This project will combine laboratory experiments, gene expression studies and genome analyses. We will focus particularly on springtails and fungus gnats, as males in these species carry and express their father's genomes, but do not pass them on to their offspring. In addition, these species still retain recognizable sex chromosomes, which enables informative sex chromosome / autosome comparisons (e.g. [3] for a similar approach). These experimental approaches will be combined with comparative phylogenetic analyses and the development of novel evolutionary theory, according to the interests of the student. The project is cosupervised by Dr. Gardner (University of St. Andrews) a leading mathematical biologist whose works spans a wide range of topics in theoretical biology and genetics. The proposed project strongly rest upon this collaboration as, on the one hand, formalization of the relevant theoretical hypotheses is currently lacking and, on the other hand, empirical work is required for estimation of key model parameters. The candidate will be based primarily in Edinburgh, as required by the empirical work, but will spend 1-2 days per month in St. Andrews for the duration of the project, as well as two 1-2 month intensive visits to the Gardner lab in years 2 and 3. [1] Bonduriansky, Russell, and Stephen F. Chenoweth. "Intralocus sexual conflict." Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24.5 (2009): 280-288. [2] De la Filia, Andres G., Stevie A. Bain, and Laura Ross. "Haplodiploidy and the reproductive ecology of Arthropods." Current Opinion in Insect Science (2015). [3] Jaquiry, Julie, et al. "Masculinization of the X chromosome in the pea aphid." Plos Genet 9 (2013): e1003690. Project 2: Sexual conflict and the loss of paternal genes in a group of Australian insects In thousands of insects reproduction involves "Genomic exclusion", where males discard the chromosomes they inherited from their father (Paternal Genome Elimination, PGE). This unusual type of reproduction gives rise to sons that inherit genes from both their parents, but in which genes inherited from their father are suppressed and eliminated. As a result, males do never pass on any genes from their father (Gardner & Ross, 2014; Ross et al.) Until now, the lack of suitable insect study systems has made it difficult to understand PGE: It is absent in established model systems such as Drosophila and tends to be evolutionarily conserved, making comparative studies difficult. However we recently identified a group of Australian scale insects that vary in the way they reproduce, with some species eliminating their father's genes while others do not. This group therefore provides a rare chance for acquiring new insights into the way this peculiar type of reproduction evolved as well as the way it is accomplished. The main questions addressed in the project are why and how males in some species eliminate the genes they inherit from their fathers, while others do not. Understanding this will give general insights into why reproduction is so variable across the tree of life. The proposed project will study the reproduction of a group of insects that is found exclusively in Australia and feeds on eucalyptus trees. The project on one hand will involve sampling and determining the reproductive strategy of a large number of species as well as determine ecological factors that might explain some of this variation. On the other hand it will focus in more detail on a single genus of Cystococcus (Semple et al. 2015, see figure 1), in which three species vary in the presence of PGE. We will compare these three species using a combination of genetic, genomic and cytogenetic approaches to understand how and why they vary in their reproductive genetics. Although primarily based at the University of Edinburgh, the project will involve fieldtrips and labwork at the University of Queensland in Australia, in collaboration with Dr. Lyn Cook. - Gardner, A. & Ross, L. (2014) Mating ecology explains patterns of genome elimination Ecology Letters 17, 1602-1612. - Ross, L., Pen, I. & Shuker, D. M. (2010). Genomic conflict in scale insects: the causes and consequences of bizarre genetic systems. Biological Reviews 85, 807-828. * Semple, T., Gullan, P., Hodgson, C., Hardy, N., & Cook, L. (2015). Systematic review of the Australian. Invertebrate Systematics 29, 287-312. For informal enquiries contact Dr Laura Ross at laura.ross@ed.ac.uk. Funding options are available for both UK and non-UK students but deadlines vary so please get in touch asap. Laura Ross
We should preserve biodiversity
Monday, November 2, 2015
two PhD projects at the University of Edinburgh
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment